Last year brought highs and lows in the global effort to confront climate change. On one hand, we saw an upsurge in international commitment to action, including deals announced at the extraordinary One Planet Summit that marked two years since the signing of the Paris Agreement. On the other, 2017 was marked by the devastation and loss that climate extremes continue to wreak on people and economies through more severe hurricanes, floods, drought, and wildfires. The fact remains: at the current rate of progress, we are not on track to achieve the Paris Agreement targets. And once again, we even see emissions back on the rise.
This is why innovative partnerships like the Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition are so important. Through this coalition, we can inspire greater ambition and show—by example—how to overcome challenges. We are seeing this more and more as public and private stakeholders come together to drive sensible action on climate change. Now, many leaders in industry and government are looking to carbon pricing tools as costeffective mechanisms for creating incentives for climate action. They see the triple dividend of carbon pricing: its contributions to the health of the environment and the public; the revenue it generates; and the innovation and critical investments in clean and low-emission technologies that it can drive.
The Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition Leadership Report serves as the Coalition’s annual report by providing the latest on CPLC activities while also aiming to inspire government and business leaders to take more action
Access Rights Type:
2018 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and International Development Association / The World Bank
Australia's Chief Scientist Alan Finkel points out, in this interview, the need for Australia to develop better storage systems and reflects on the recent report from ACOLA. California Energy Commissioner Andrew McAllister, also warns Australia to pursue demand side...Read more
In response to feedback, high-income households can reduce their energy use to a larger degree than low-income households (17% vs 3% reduction). This and other insights were gained by two rapid reviews into research, both Australian and International, on digital services and...Read more
Research showed that one-quarter of Sydney respondents were open to consolidating property for sale with neighbours. However, consolidated lot sales are not part of the business model of most real estate agencies, local government, or property developers. It’s an area where the...Read more
This article analyses the implementation of emissions trading systems (ETSs) in eight jurisdictions: the EU, Switzerland, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) and California in the US, Québec in Canada, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea and pilot schemes in China. The article clarifies what is working, what isn’t and why, when it comes to the practice of implementing an ETS.
This paper presents the potential benefits and challenges of enhanced international co-ordination on carbon pricing and outlines the different types and levels of co-ordination that are available for national and sub-national governments.
Today, about 40 national and over 20 sub-national jurisdictions responsible for almost one fourth of global greenhouse gas emissions are putting a price on carbon. This report reviews key developments and prospects of existing and emerging carbon initiatives.