An emissions trading system (ETS) is a market-based mechanism that is applied to achieve emissions targets at least cost. By fixing a quantity of emissions (the cap), requiring that companies surrender one allowance for each unit of emissions generated and making the allowance tradable, a carbon market is created through which an allowance price emerges. For producers, the allowance price is treated as a marginal cost in operation decisions and is a commodity that needs to be reflected in investment appraisals. It encourages them to optimize their operations with a view on the system-wide emissions constraint, render their goods less emissions-intensive or to make low-carbon investments. For consumers, carbon-intensive goods become more expensive, encouraging a switch to low-carbon alternatives or to change consumption patterns (e.g., energy efficiency). The relative change in prices creates incentives to invest in low-carbon assets and to develop new products, processes and technologies that use carbon more efficiently. At the same time, high-carbon assets become less competitive, which could lead to an accelerated decommissioning of these assets.
When declining emission caps are set also for future periods, an ETS serves not only as an economic (carbon pricing) mechanism but also as an informational instrument; that there will be less scope for emissions-intensive activities in our future economies. This can provide visibility and accountability on the longer-term pathways for time horizons that potentially go beyond the periods that are most relevant for decision-making on long-lived assets. The long term signal will be strongest where the ETS is embedded within a credible, long-term policy architecture that reduces uncertainty for participants.
Australia's Chief Scientist Alan Finkel points out, in this interview, the need for Australia to develop better storage systems and reflects on the recent report from ACOLA. California Energy Commissioner Andrew McAllister, also warns Australia to pursue demand side...Read more
The systematic review process in research ensures that all applicable research is considered. These studies demonstrate a rapid review method which enables a quicker answer to some of government's immediate pressing questions.Read more
In response to feedback, high-income households can reduce their energy use to a larger degree than low-income households (17% vs 3% reduction). This and other insights were gained by two rapid reviews into research, both Australian and International, on digital services and...Read more
Emissions trading systems (ETSs) as a cost-effective instrument for emissions control in the power sector are now being implemented or considered across a diverse set of jurisdictions. However, regulation in the power sector may impede or alter the functioning of an ETS.
In September 2018, the International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP) launched this guide, which consolidates the experiences from ICAP Members that have considered or operate a linked market alongside insights from the literature. It provides policymakers with step-by-step guidance throughout the whole process of linking.
This article analyses the implementation of emissions trading systems (ETSs) in eight jurisdictions: the EU, Switzerland, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) and California in the US, Québec in Canada, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea and pilot schemes in China. The article clarifies what is working, what isn’t and why, when it comes to the practice of implementing an ETS. The eight ETSs are evaluated against five main criteria: environmental effectiveness, economic efficiency, market management, revenue management and stakeholder engagement.