The latest version of the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) aims to achieve a highly energy efficient and decarbonised building stock by 2050, and compels Member States to develop respective roadmaps, guidelines and measurable, targeted actions.
In order to garner the views on issues and challenges facing the transition, BPIE developed a survey to ask building professionals from across Europe their views on the policies and actions needed to accelerate and realise the transition to a highly energy efficient and decarbonised building stock. In total, 71 experts responded to the online survey, which was conducted by RAND over a 6-week period in February-March 2018. Experts came from 17 different EU Member States. Nearly half of respondents represented the private sector, while a quarter were from research institutes.
Shifting towards the EPBD 2018 vision of an energy efficient and decarbonised EU building stock by 2050 is seen by experts as an important policy objective for the EU, even though the vast majority consider that the EU is currently not on track to achieve this. Given the complexity of the sector, there is no single solution to the issue. Notwithstanding the revised EPBD, experts considered that stronger policies and regulatory measures resulting in improved energy performance of buildings are needed to deliver a decarbonised building stock. Mandatory measures such as minimum performance standards, better enforcement and banning inefficient or high carbon products are considered to be among the most important actions.
Whilst this survey flags up the key issues affecting the sector, further effort is required in order to develop an appropriate policy mix in a given market, and to ensure that supporting measures, financing options and engagement strategies are properly aligned to engage building owners in the transition to a decarbonised building stock.
Five key policy actions, supported by at least half of the experts, were identified:
• Setting ambitious minimum energy performance requirements (supported by 71% of respondents). This includes banning or phasing out solid fuel and oil boilers, as well as inefficient gas-fired boilers and appliances.
• Rigorously enforcing building regulations concerning energy use (supported by 69% of respondents).
• Setting ambitious mandatory renovation targets (supported by 61% of respondents).
• Setting EU-wide net zero emission targets for new buildings (supported by 60% of respondents).
• Requiring building renovation passports for deep renovation over a period of time (supported by 56% of respondents).
Australia's Chief Scientist Alan Finkel points out, in this interview, the need for Australia to develop better storage systems and reflects on the recent report from ACOLA. California Energy Commissioner Andrew McAllister, also warns Australia to pursue demand side...Read more
Research showed that one-quarter of Sydney respondents were open to consolidating property for sale with neighbours. However, consolidated lot sales are not part of the business model of most real estate agencies, local government, or property developers. It’s an area where the...Read more
The systematic review process in research ensures that all applicable research is considered. These studies demonstrate a rapid review method which enables a quicker answer to some of government's immediate pressing questions.Read more
A new analysis sets out a long-term roadmap for further development of the Bulgarian renovation programme for multi-family buildings. Following the implementation of the programme’s first phase, the analysis argues for a shift in focus towards achieving higher energy classes, reducing at the same time the level of public subsidy in a measured and manageable manner.
In general, a household is said to be in energy poverty when its members cannot afford to keep adequately warm. The combination of low incomes, energy prices and inefficient housing leads to energy poverty.
An effective renovation strategy supported by proper financing schemes can solve vital environmental problems such as lowering CO2-emissions and improving air quality. However, although a large variety of financing mechanisms exists and a lot of funding will be available until 2020, not all measures seem to be effective.
An abundance of scientific studies points to evidence that indoor environmental quality (IEQ) has a direct effect on health, comfort, wellbeing and productivity. Considering that people spend a large amount of their time indoors, it is crucial that building legislation ensures sufficient levels of IEQ to promote healthy and comfortable indoor environments.