The objective of national building renovation strategies, as required by Article 4 of the Energy Efficiency Directive, is to establish long-term confidence in the market, spur investments and increase the renovation rate in the EU. While initial strategies (published in 2014-15) were a first step, Member States are required to develop a second and updated version by April 2017. Based on qualitative interviews with actors from different sectors, this report finds that more comprehensive action is needed for the EU and its Member States to ensure an effective renovation of the European building stock.
During the summer of 2016, BPIE interviewed 69 stakeholders from 12 EU Member States with a view to gaining a perspective on what has been achieved so far since 2014 in implementing building renovation strategies, and to get an idea of what can be expected for the second version of the strategies. Views were sought on a range of topics, including action on tackling barriers, legislative measures, engagement with stakeholders and introduction of financing schemes and other support measures.
The findings revealed a sharp divergence of opinion between governmental actors (governments and energy agencies), who generally felt that the implementation of the existing strategy and the preparation for the next one was going well, and non-governmental actors – industry, NGOs, and research institutes, who generally held a much more sceptical view. On questions regarding “implementation of the current strategy”, the scores for governmental actors were in average 3.79 out of 5 (i.e. the best score), compared to just 2.72 for other respondents. Similarly, on “preparation for the strategy update”, the scores were in average 3.70 compared to 2.64. It is clear that this mismatch in perspective leads to serious shortcomings in the strategy development and implementation processes, and needs to be resolved as a matter of urgency if the scope for a cost-effective renovation of Europe’s building stock is to be realised.
Accordingly, governments and those involved in the strategy development process are encouraged to consider the following recommendations:
While there is no official requirement for Member States to respond to the Joint Research Centre’s (JRC) findings on their national renovation strategy, governments should deeply reflect on the assessment and also take into account the overall learning process that has been witnessed throughout the EU-28 in this important, yet under-prioritised policy area.
With little time left until the submission deadline for the second version of the strategies, due in April 2017, now is the time to influence the strategy development process, and take on board the lessons from the first round.
Stakeholders have a lot to offer, and seem willing to support governments to ensure that strategies are effective. Where there are currently no stakeholder forums, governments should establish these as a matter of urgency.
Governments should identify comprehensive solutions to issues holding back the renovation market as a priority area for legislation and regulation or take other appropriate action.
Whilst there has been some progress on financing schemes, they lack a clear framework and do not give the long-term market confidence signals that investors require.
In parallel with finance, integrated support measures such as one-stop-shop programmes and quality frameworks need to be developed in order to increase the quality and quantity of renovations.
Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE) 2016
A rapid review on green-rated office buildings, and their operational energy use, found that the conclusions of six studies ranged from the certified buildings performing worse, similarly or much better than the non-certified buildings in terms of energy usage intensity. Two...Read more
In response to feedback, high-income households can reduce their energy use to a larger degree than low-income households (17% vs 3% reduction). This and other insights were gained by two rapid reviews into research, both Australian and International, on digital services and...Read more
Industry misconceptions around high cost and poor market interest in energy efficient homes continue to obstruct the mass adoption of low carbon housing. Josh’s House demonstrates that low carbon housing is accessible and cost effective. The Star Performers series showcases how...Read more
The impact of building renovation on health, well-being and productivity could improve the lives of more than 200 million Europeans. This set of publications, developed by BPIE and commissioned by Buildings 2030, takes an important step towards defining, measuring, quantifying and monetising the impact of indoor environmental quality in schools, hospitals and offices. The findings reveal a major business opportunity to invest in people-centric renovation of existing buildings.
A new analysis sets out a long-term roadmap for further development of the Bulgarian renovation programme for multi-family buildings. Following the implementation of the programme’s first phase, the analysis argues for a shift in focus towards achieving higher energy classes, reducing at the same time the level of public subsidy in a measured and manageable manner.
While the focus is on the City of Belgrade, the aim of this report is to support all public authorities and agencies developing and implementing integrated approaches to both energy efficiency in buildings and district energy supply. It provides guidance to decision-makers in Belgrade, while presenting universal recommendations to align district energy and energy efficiency in buildings. Combining energy efficiency measures and district energy is often seen in the context of achieving deep decarbonisation in the most cost-effective manner.