The Addressing Urban and Human Settlement Issues in National Adaptation Plans Supplementary Guide (referred hereafter as the NAP-HS Guide) aims to comprehensively address urban and human settlement issues in National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) at the formulation and implementation stage. The guide is aligned with the Least Developed Countries Expert Group (LEG) NAP Technical Guidelines and has been developed in conjunction with numerous partners, including the UNFCCC, non-government organizations, the private sector and representatives of member states.
The guide primarily targets decision-makers at the national level working on NAPs, both within and outside UNFCCC focal point ministries, while it also targets a broader set of stakeholders at the national and sub-national levels who are interested in NAPs or who may be involved in their implementation.
The guide is divided into four Sections:
Part 1 – Introduces the guide and frames the topic of addressing urban and human settlement issues in NAPs.
Part 2 – Outlines the case for considering cities and towns in NAPs. It seeks to answer the question why undertake urban adaptation.
Part 3 – Introduces the practicalities of working at the sub-national level by asking how to effectively undertake adaptation in towns and cities. This guidance is provided to familiarize NAP stakeholders with city adaptation processes, which in turn will help to address urban adaptation in NAPs. This section points the reader to a substantial body of literature and guidance that guides decision making on urban adaptation.
Part 4 – Ties the previous sections together by considering scaling urban adaptation into national policy. It considers finance in particular, asking how globally significant change be affected in and by cities.
All Rights Reserved
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) 2018
Rapid global urbanization and the increase of the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect make urban cooling a necessity as well as an opportunity to increase the liveability and amenity of cities. This review is a scoping study of the relevant worldwide UHI mitigation/adaptation...Read more
Australia's Chief Scientist Alan Finkel points out, in this interview, the need for Australia to develop better storage systems and reflects on the recent report from ACOLA. California Energy Commissioner Andrew McAllister, also warns Australia to pursue demand side...Read more
The systematic review process in research ensures that all applicable research is considered. These studies demonstrate a rapid review method which enables a quicker answer to some of government's immediate pressing questions.Read more
It is becoming increasingly crucial to develop methods and strategies to assess building performance under the changing climate and to yield a more sustainable and resilient design. However, the outputs of climate models have a coarse spatial and temporal resolution and cannot be used directly in building energy simulation tools.
The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) has produced this brief report to highlight how states and communities are responding to the risks they face in both the short and long-term. The report features the voices of experts from the public and private sector who participated in the November 2017 Greenbuild roundtable in Boston, entitled “Building Back Better after the Storm.” Each article aims to connect resilience needs with smarter, stronger, and greener solutions that can be implemented at the state level.
The powerpoint presentation gives an overview of how resilience could align with USGBC's mission. Outline of the resilience-enhancing strategies within LEED and each of GBCI's rating systems, links to USGBC resilience collateral, etc. LEED, PEER, SITES, RELi, GRESB and LEED for Cities (including STAR).
In this report, the World Bank and World Resources Institute show how the next generation of infrastructure projects can tap natural systems and, where appropriate, integrate green and gray infrastructure.