A growing body of research shows that healthy watersheds are a vital component of a well-functioning water supply infrastructure system. When green infrastructure is used to complement, substitute, or safeguard traditional gray infrastructure, it can achieve optimal service delivery and save water suppliers (and water customers) money. The strategic protection, management, and restoration of natural systems within watersheds (often referred to as green infrastructure) can, for example:
better moderate sediment and nutrient fluxes and improve downstream water quality, thereby helping water suppliers meet water quality standards
lower costs for water suppliers compared to gray infrastructure options and recover investment costs
help mitigate the impacts of climate change and natural hazards (e.g., droughts and floods) to avoid service disruptions and failures; and
generate numerous co-benefits for local communities and society such as recreation, public health improvement, and carbon sequestration.
The Green-Gray Assessment (GGA) is a six-step methodology that can be used for investigating and valuing the costs and benefits of integrating green (or natural) infrastructure into existing water supply systems to improve their performance.
Quantifying the costs of green infrastructure investments in upstream watersheds and benefits for urban water supply systems can inform important investment decisions of water suppliers, water regulators, and land conservation and restoration organizations.
Before conducting a GGA, one should first understand local contextual conditions, engage stakeholders, and ensure the right skill set for the GGA analysis team. These preassessment steps facilitate data collection and help ensure that GGA results reach targeted decision-makers and financiers.
This document provides step-by-step guidance for how to conduct a GGA, including pre-assessment steps, and integrates experiences from four GGAs that examined the return on investment of upstream forest restoration and conservation for urban water suppliers in Brazil (Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Vitória) and Mexico (Monterrey).
Rapid global urbanization and the increase of the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect make urban cooling a necessity as well as an opportunity to increase the liveability and amenity of cities. This review is a scoping study of the relevant worldwide UHI mitigation/adaptation...Read more
Industry misconceptions around high cost and poor market interest in energy efficient homes continue to obstruct the mass adoption of low carbon housing. Josh’s House demonstrates that low carbon housing is accessible and cost effective. The Star Performers series showcases how...Read more
The 2020s are predicted to be a decade of transformation for urban mobility. There are at least six forces that are expected to disrupt the urban mobility landscape. From self-driving vehicles and the sharing economy, through to vehicle electrification, mobile computing, the...Read more
In this report, the World Bank and World Resources Institute show how the next generation of infrastructure projects can tap natural systems and, where appropriate, integrate green and gray infrastructure.
This report aims to help policymakers identify what options could be included in a low-cost policy package (a combination of policies, measures, and technologies) to achieve Mexico´s Greenhouse Gas abatement targets and a more ambitious emissions trajectory, along with the benefits associated with both.
Climate change affects everyone, but in cities, low-income communities often face the starkest threats. On average, low-income neighborhoods have fewer parks and green spaces to absorb stormwater, provide cooling shade, and protect homes and businesses from flooding.
Several standards regarding energy consumption have emerged in the last decade, defining increasing requirements, and culminating with the recent emergence of the “nearly zero energy” buildings concept, as described in the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive1. However, these standards are mainly focused on new buildings neglecting, most of the time, the existing ones that represent the least efficient, the largest consumers and the largest share of the building stock.