This report presents a summary of the findings and activities of Stage 2 of the LCL-CRC research project RP 1033 “High Performance Commercial Building HVAC”.
This research examined the HVAC design of a high performance commercial office building (hereafter referred to as the case study building) and compared its electricity consumption to that of a standard BCA compliant HVAC design for the same building. The main HVAC system designed and installed in the case study building as a low temperature VAV, air-water HVAC system, which is one of the most common designs currently utilised for commercial buildings. The case study building is based on a project completed by AECOM where they were engaged as both the Mechanical Services and ESD consultant.
This study was used to gain a better understanding of HVAC design used in high performance buildings verses that required for minimum code compliance. This work is part of a broader CRC project - Mainstreaming High Performance HVAC, which is looking at factors associated with facilitating increased industry uptake of high performance HVAC design. The focus of this study is to examine the potential energy savings from improved duct and pipe system design.
A validated IES model for the case study building and its associated high efficiency HVAC design (the case study HVAC design) was utilised in this work. The following two scenarios were modelled and compared:
A HVAC design that met the minimum BCA HVAC requirements (BCA compliant HVAC design)
The case study HVAC design
The simulation results showed that the annual electricity consumption of the case study HVAC system was 13% less than the consumption for the BCA compliant HVAC system. This was mainly due to energy usage reductions in the air handling units (AHU’s) and return air (RA) fans (24% reduction), the chillers (25% reduction) and the chilled water pumps (28% reduction) for the case study HVAC design compared to the BCA compliant HVAC design.
The energy reduction for the AHU’s fans for the case study HVAC design was achieved by using larger ducts (around 10% larger hydraulic diameter), more efficient duct fittings as well as reducing the number of duct fittings. Further, the energy reduction in the chillers and their associated chilled water pumps for the case study HVAC design was achieved by selecting more efficient chillers and utilizing larger pipes for the chilled water pipe network (around 7% larger hydraulic diameter).
Other aspects of the case study HVAC design did not achieve as great an energy reduction as the three components described previously. As such, for all elements of the case study HVAC design, the overall reduction in electricity consumption achieved was 13% in comparison to the BCA compliant HVAC system. Note that this reduction in the electricity consumption for the case study building leads to an approximate 171 tons reduction in annual CO2 emissions.
Additionally, an economic analysis was performed to determine the cost-benefit of the case study HVAC design compared to the BCA compliant HVAC design. The results showed that the initial cost of the case study HVAC design is only 1% greater than the capital cost of the BCA compliant HVAC design. Further, a discounted payback period of 4 years was calculated for the additional cost invested on the case study HVAC design instead of the BCA compliant HVAC design.
The widespread adoption of the design criteria utilised for the case study HVAC design is recommended for other low temperature VAV, air-water HVAC systems. If adopted by HVAC designers, this approach would lead to significant reductions in the energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions of these systems.
Industry misconceptions around high cost and poor market interest in energy efficient homes continue to obstruct the mass adoption of low carbon housing. Josh’s House demonstrates that low carbon housing is accessible and cost effective. The Star Performers series showcases how...Read more
A rapid review on green-rated office buildings, and their operational energy use, found that the conclusions of six studies ranged from the certified buildings performing worse, similarly or much better than the non-certified buildings in terms of energy usage intensity. Two...Read more
In response to feedback, high-income households can reduce their energy use to a larger degree than low-income households (17% vs 3% reduction). This and other insights were gained by two rapid reviews into research, both Australian and International, on digital services and...Read more
This guide acts as a practical reference for the design of high-performance, low-carbon commercial buildings. The target audience is everyone involved in the creation of new commercial buildings, from architects, consultants and designers, to developers and owners. The guide delves into the technical details of many issues but is suitable for anyone wanting to explore low-carbon building...